I do not doubt for a second the sincerity of the chairman and the ranking member and their support for the Ohio replacement program. This chart, which the Navy produced, showing the 30-year shipbuilding plan, if we fully fund the Ohio class program, as well as a 300-ship Navy, demonstrates exactly the problem that confronts us today. It shows, again, a red line across, which shows the modern era of shipbuilding at about $15 billion a year; and, with the yellow portion of the chart, it shows how, for 13 years, Congress, starting in the 2020s, is going to be asked to raise unprecedented amounts of money for the shipbuilding account. The fact of the matter is this is an asset that is not just the Navy's; it is the country's. Under New START, 70 percent of the nuclear triad will be borne by the Navy through its submarine program, far greater than in the past. The Air Force and their long-range bombers and the Army, with their ground-based systems, are not going to be bearing the same burden as a result of the Ohio class' planned burden under New START. We have an opportunity to do something sensible, which is based in clear precedent, as the gentleman from Virginia indicated. The sealift fund was funded out of the shipbuilding account. The missile-based system was funded on a separate account because these are national assets that provided assistance and national security across the board for the Pentagon.…
Share
More from Joe Courtney
I think all of New England and the mid- Atlantic States owe a huge thanks to Judge Royce Lambeth, the Reagan appointee who lived up to his oath and twice asserted the power of the judiciary, a coequal branch of government, to rein in the…
Project 2025, which is the document generated by the Heritage Foundation, with dozens of former Trump officials, Russell Vought, the former budget director of the Trump administration
this week, Congress will have an opportunity to assert its constitutional role when we vote for the second time on a War Powers Act resolution to force President Trump to seek legal authority for his unilateral military campaign in Iran…
this is incredibly problematic and entirely unjustifiable. Put simply, there is no reason for Congress to actively remove these protections for those fighters who choose to sign with the UBO, and there is no reason for a UBO to be exempt…





