There is a greater need for flexibility, as Ms. Dempsey pointed out in her comments, to grow the Ex-Im Bank to make it more available to more companies.
Jim Himes
The Public Record
Jim Himes is an American politician serving as the U.S. Representative for Connecticut's 4th congressional district since 2009. A member of the Democratic Party, he has focused on issues such as economic growth, healthcare, and national security during his tenure in Congress. Himes has been an advocate for democratic norms and transparency in government, often emphasizing the importance of the intelligence community in national discussions.
I want to pick up on a line of questioning that Mr. Garcia started around leveraged lending.
So, in fact, what's going to happen here is exactly what has happened by all -- with all of the other manufactured, politically driven scandals that the Republicans and the defenders of the president cook up, which is that a fair…
Of course not, right? I mean, this is the sort of ongoing theme of this administration.
But the law, it could not be more clear here. And so this is really the fundamental issue is, are we going to allow the President to blatantly ignore the law?
Well, that's obviously their strategy here and so that raises a couple of questions. I mean, to all of us, and I include my Republican colleagues in there -- in this, they need to decide whether they will support this strategy because it…
Nothing could be further from the truth and I mean, it really an interesting case because as you know, Anderson, there is always a dance under every president over how fast you produce documents over some investigation Congress is doing or…
I couldn't agree with you more, that this is a whole-of-government, whole-of-society problem.
For generations we have built our way to prosperity. But sadly, concerns in the last several generations about how to pay for infrastructure have left us in an ever more desperate situation.
I just, given the intensity and the urgency of this problem, appeal to every member of this committee and to all my colleagues and to Members of the Senate to let's not let the perfect be the enemy of economic survival.
Infrastructure continues to be the single most pressing issue in my district in southwestern Connecticut.
The good news is our new Governor, Ned Lamont, has proposed a very serious focus on transportation.
we are coming up short and must address this problem with the necessary investment at the Federal, State, and local level.
We need to give them the means, the mechanism, and the opportunity to get back into the workforce.
I think this $5 billion for the Housing Trust Fund is absolutely needed, and I thank you, Madam Chairwoman, for placing it in there.
there is no question that the Senate would vote to keep, regardless of the fact pattern, to keep the President in office.
I don't think there is a crime that this President could commit that would cause the Republican Party to turn on him.
the Constitution would say you should at least begin the process of studying whether the President committed, you know, enough high crime and misdemeanor to warrant removal.
Yes, I absolutely do. You know, having now read it, I'm sort of stunned by the clarity with which Bob Mueller said hey -- and by the way, this directly is contradicted by what we heard from the attorney general, who, you know, who said…
I rise this morning to talk about a word that is everywhere, a word that is the response to every idea that we come up with, and that word is ``socialism.'' It is a scary word. It is a magical word. It is the word that comes up every time…
I don't ever want to go through that again, because I think we can maybe, maybe sustain one of those, but I don't think that this democracy can sustain another.
the American people saw trillions of dollars of value disappear for reasons they didn't fully understand
The attorney general didn't do himself any favors when he essentially arrogated a judgment that is not his to make, when he said that, you know, I got together with my deputy and we decided there's no obstruction of justice, even if…
It would be wrong for the Congress to just assume that the executive was going to be fulsome in its disclosure about itself.





