Jen Psaki

Yes, it’s absolutely truth and having sat in the Oval Office with him, you know, when he decides to make one of those calls, when he says he doesn’t want to make one of those calls, he doesn’t really require a call sheet.

this is an issue people have been waiting on for some time, creating a reunification task force that can help finally bring some relief to families who have been cruelly and immorally separated from -- as a result of the policies of the…

Nobody is naive in the White House about how hard it’s going to be and none of us think that Republicans are just going to lay down and work with us overnight, but we feel like we have to try.

We’re not asking states to do this on their own. In fact, we’re asking -- we are trying to reset and be partners here in a more effective way than we have seen over the last 10 months.

That package, he feels that package is designed for bipartisan support.

now is not the time to be lifting any travel restrictions.

With the pandemic worsening and more variants around the world, this isn`t the time to be lifting restrictions on international travel.

The American people spoke resoundingly in this election, and 81 million people have voted for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. Congress will certify the results of the election as they do every four years regardless of whatever answer anyone…

Our preference here, Anderson, is for the GSA Administrator just to sign the document as it's been happening for 60 years and we can all move on.

There have been many times throughout history where there had been recounts, where there has been litigation where the election has still been ascertained.

It's clear now, there's no mathematical path forward for Trump and we are obviously trying to get our job and get our get our jobs going here.

It's not just that Attorney General Barr disagreed on the sentencing guidelines. He also replaced the lead prosecutor with a buddy of his.

This is about protecting the United States of America for the next election.

If Trump can't keep his -- you know, his powder dry on Twitter and he keeps attacking witnesses, it's going to make it very hard for Republicans in the Senate.

the answer should always be no.

They both acknowledge that the President of the United States should not be seeking political dirt on an opponent.

I think that probably left a mark with people. So at least on the political front I think it was a very bad move by the president.

I think it's fair to say Ambassador Sondland is not a typical ambassador.

There were two years when Donald Trump was not raising his concerns about Joe Biden and Hunter Biden. It wasn't an issue for him until Joe Biden announced he was going to run for President.

I think it matters also -- if you watch what Adam Schiff said yesterday at the beginning and the end, and Nancy Pelosi today at their press conference, they're trying to broaden this beyond Trump.

President Trump was trying to bribe a foreign power to benefit himself personally.

But you can see some semblance of an additional bullet point the Republicans will add.

He has a huge policy bone to pick here. He has a lot of fellow Republicans who have long been advocates of that as well.

It's been remarkably consistent from Colonel Vindman to almost every official who has testified except for perhaps Ambassador Sondland.

This puts in place some rules. They don't expect Republican votes.