Jen Psaki

I'm certain but if they were to move forward with military action, they would say they have legal authorization for that.

There are so many questions that one has to ask one's self before you take an action like this.

I hope that he's asking some of the questions when he's meeting with his military advisors that President Obama would have, which is what next, what then, what will strikes do, and how will that impact our overall strategy in Syria and in…

I think he's one significant player in this entire unraveling Russia connection onion here.

Well, when you talk about national security issues though, I mean, the reason that China and India committed to the Paris Accord where the big -- world's biggest submitters, the three of us, is because of us.

It's just a dishonest promise to the coal miners and people who are in these towns, because coal jobs are going away because of competition, because of automation, because there's a lack of demand by the steel industry in China.

And if they didn't discuss business, where they discuss thing sanctions, I can tell you, I have left here transition. It is not normal to meeting with the head of a state run bank of a government where we have an adversarial relationship…

this is the first step in the process.

Yes, they've been running on it for quite some time but Obamacare is now at 53 percent approval rating in the latest Pew Poll.

We don't know what's in part two and three, and unless part two and three are addressing the huge gaps that are going to be getting left for people who are on Medicaid now, unless it gives funding to Planned Parenthood, I don't think…

This is a much larger issue I think than pulling people in for a bill.

Look. I think there's a couple scenarios here that we've already talked about. Either this is completely false or the Justice Department and the FBI had enough information to get a warrant from a FISA Court and they did that, and they have…

What was the view from inside, you know, the Obama administration of Ambassador Kislyak?

I think its part of the continued effort by the Trump administration to distract from the more problematic story, which is the ongoing investigation into the connections with Russia that are problematic.

They want to keep the focus on leaks and their investigation to crack down on leaks.

I think there are already questions raised and Paul was touching on the fact that the context here is what makes this pretty fishy because the intelligence community, all of the intelligence agencies concluded together that President Putin…

The story here is not about leaks. Sure they should investigate leaks internally if they want to. It's about what the president knew when. It's about who directed this. And it's about a long trend of questionable ties with the Russian…

We take every step possible to protect our personnel. We're working with the Japanese government to ensure that necessary security measures are in place.

We've increased our capacity we've increased our tracking, we've increased our coordination but clearly this is a threat that we take seriously enough to put it at the front center of our agenda.

We are of course aware of the reports that a U.S. citizen was detained in North Korea. As you all know, there is no greater priority to us than the welfare and safety of U.S. citizens.

We don't name ambassadors from the State Department. The White House names ambassadors.

The president thought that this was outrageous, these comments were outrageous and demeaning to women.

Voters in the country aren't looking for a, quote, 'salesman in chief.'

Well look, I think we were reminded with this interview that Mitt Romney was willing to say and do anything to be president even if it means hiding to his own positions.

Well, look, I think we were reminded with this interview that Mitt Romney is willing to say and do anything to be president, even if it means hiding from his own positions.