I want to say as well that I am excited to be back for 2 years to wrestle with the people's business, and these are very important issues. As co-chairman of the 9/11 Commission Caucus, I could tell you reasons why you might want to vote against the bill. It does not provide the total amount spent on intelligence. It does not address recommendations to shift covert operations from CIA to defense. It does not create a separate appropriation subcommittee on intelligence. It does not make a select permanent committee a full committee, nor does it address the jurisdictions of the Department of Homeland Security. I could tell you those would be reasons why you could be disappointed. But why you should like this bill is that it deals with expanding risk-based funding, and it deals more with interoperability, which is a huge issue. I am particularly concerned about screening all cargo on passenger planes within 3 years, and I am happy this bill does that.
Christopher Shays: “I want to say as well that I am excited to be back for 2 years to wrestle with the people's business, and these are very…”
On the recordJanuary 9, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of a bill related to intelligence and security funding.
Share
More from Christopher Shays
Sep 9, 2013
When it comes to foreign policy, and the Middle East in particular, it appears we live in a strategy-free world.
Jun 11, 2008
I rise in support today of H.R. 6003, the Passenger Rail Investment Improvement Act, because we can't afford our Nation's rail service to fail. Our economy depends on it, and the September 11 terrorist attacks made clear that our country…
Sep 9, 2013
I think we do ourselves well to wash our mouth with soap about our credibility.
Sep 9, 2013
I am concerned it will inflame the region and retaliate not only Iran and Hezbollah against Israel but at the same time embolden and empower these rebel forces.





