the issue is not whether DHS funding is used in contravention. It is whether or not there is any penalty to be assessed to enforce the law that is on the books. Naturally there has been no suit brought or whatever because there is no penalty in the law itself. What we are doing here is providing a penalty for the violation of the law.
Tom Tancredo: “the issue is not whether DHS funding is used in contravention. It is whether or not there is any penalty to be assessed…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for penalties in laws related to DHS funding.
Share
More from Tom Tancredo
What we're doing here in this immigration battle is testing our willingness to actually hold together as a nation or split apart into a lot of balkanized pieces.
At the present time, it is not. But if we pass this amendment, it would be, yes. There has to be some sort of penalty assessed to the law that is already on the books or, of course, it is of no value. That is why so many cities have…
We are testing our willingness to actually hold on to something called the English language, something that is the glue that is supposed to hold us together as a nation.
in fact, this is not a unique situation, unique to the extent that the House has not acted before in a criminal case of this nature, but in fact, the House has acted in the past to intervene in cases where we have determined that the…





