In fact, this is not a unique situation, unique to the extent that the House has not acted before in a criminal case of this nature, but in fact, the House has acted in the past to intervene in cases where we have determined that the outcome was something we did not agree with. We've done it. We've stripped courts of certain abilities to actually hear cases. In the past, we've actually passed legislation to change or overturn cases. One was, of course, the case of the Ten Commandments. Another one was, I believe, Congressman Bernie Sanders at the time passed a bill to overturn a case with regard to pension funds. So it is not unique that we would be doing this.
Tom Tancredo: “In fact, this is not a unique situation, unique to the extent that the House has not acted before in a criminal case of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the House's historical actions in intervening in judicial cases.
Share
More from Tom Tancredo
Now, we may think that there is no such thing as voter fraud. The fact is that unfortunately there's an enormous amount of voter fraud.
This is the kind of situation where somebody like me, somebody who does not have hundreds of millions of dollars of personal wealth, can still make a difference, because you can still get to every little cafe.
At the present time, it is not. But if we pass this amendment, it would be, yes. There has to be some sort of penalty assessed to the law that is already on the books or, of course, it is of no value. That is why so many cities have…
If illegal immigration is not stopped, terrorists could slip over the border and strike.





