in fact, this is not a unique situation, unique to the extent that the House has not acted before in a criminal case of this nature, but in fact, the House has acted in the past to intervene in cases where we have determined that the outcome was something we did not agree with. We've done it. We've stripped courts of certain abilities to actually hear cases. In the past, we've actually passed legislation to change or overturn cases. One was, of course, the case of the Ten Commandments. Another one was, I believe, Congressman Bernie Sanders at the time passed a bill to overturn a case with regard to pension funds. So it is not unique that we would be doing this.
Tom Tancredo: “in fact, this is not a unique situation, unique to the extent that the House has not acted before in a criminal case of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the House's historical actions in intervening in judicial cases.
Share
More from Tom Tancredo
any first responder money, any of the money we are talking about here in San Francisco, is currently appropriated in violation of the law, actually, and what this would do is establish that fact.
some in the most radical elements of the pro-illegal immigration groups advocate something called ``Reconquista,'' or that is to say, they want to have that part of the United States that was ceded to the United States by the Treaty of…
after 30 years in politics, I have no talent that has not been exploited.
I rise today to also welcome Pope Benedict XVI to the United States and to Washington, D.C., and congratulate him for delivering an important message on the role that faith plays in the lives of every believer. Over the years, the Vatican…





