I think that this crime bill is a very, very interesting issue, and for anyone watching this, it must be very confusing to hear one side saying one thing and the other side saying, 'No, that's not right, it's just the opposite.' So where is the truth? I must say that I just came from a press conference where the Federal Order of Police, the International Brotherhood of Police Officers, the major city chiefs, the National Organization of Police Officers, the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives, the National Sheriffs Association, the Police Executive Research Forum, and the Police Foundation had representatives there saying that in order to retain the police that we got under last year's bill, we really should stand firm and vote against the one today. I know we just heard the opposite, so what do we believe and where do we go? Not only that, but why is it so important to sort all of this out? First of all, I tend to believe the people who are in the field, the police officers.
Patricia Schroeder: “I think that this crime bill is a very, very interesting issue, and for anyone watching this, it must be very confusing…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the complexities and conflicting views surrounding a crime bill.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
editorials all over America are joining those of us who keep calling for the release of whatever it is that was produced by the outside counsel for over a half a million dollars of tax money on Speaker Gingrich's violations of the ethics…
I must say, for me this is a very sad day, because if my colleagues really believe we need the best government money can buy, they must be thrilled. Let me put this in some kind of context. My average campaign contribution when I first got…
last June I asked the Secretary of Defense to answer a few questions about growing numbers of military personnel on loan to Members of Congress under questionable circumstances. To date, I have not received a reply. Now I know why. They…
I rise to agree with what the gentleman had to say. Mr. Chairman, I tell this body that the gentleman from California is being very humble. He has worked very hard on this issue, and so has the Department of Commerce. We have a letter…





