First of all, if the gentleman is saying we are going to have a very significant amount of money taken away if my amendment passes and we freeze it at this year's level, what we are really admitting is we are really giving that agency a huge increase but we cannot say that money. But second, my question is, Is the gentleman telling us the entire $4 billion that we just found and talked about in the press a week ago, has that all been expended already?
Patricia Schroeder: “First of all, if the gentleman is saying we are going to have a very significant amount of money taken away if my…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning funding allocations during a debate on an amendment.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
Mr. Speaker, I think what we have just heard in this colloquy is why we ought to vote against this rule and get this bill out of here. We hear about cruel and unusual punishment, but this is going to be cruel and outrageous legislation…
But that ``it'' cost a half a million dollars and we cannot see it. This morning's Washington Post has a clarification of what the Speaker said about the ``it'' in it. And I hope that everybody reads it, because while the Speaker said one…
I clearly rise in support of this bill, and I really want to thank the chairman of the subcommittee, Carlos Moorhead, from California, who has done such a wonderful job to move this bill in the very short period of time we have left. We…
I am here today, first of all, to say that over the weekend I was very pleased to hear the Speaker say he had no problem with reporting to the floor the bill that I have been pushing for a very long time. That is a bill that takes the…





