I rise in support of the Hamilton amendment. I think it is the correct one. But listen to the coalition here. The gentleman from South Carolina [Mr. Spence] and the gentleman from California [Mr. Dellums] agree on this. Why do they agree on this? Be very careful. It sounds wonderful to say we are going to lift the embargo, but to do that, we are doing that unilaterally, whereas we put the embargo on with our allies. And they are going to shake their head and say, there they go again, acting like the Lone Ranger. The Hamilton amendment goes at it the right way. It says that the President should work to get the United Nations to raise the embargo the United Nations put on. The other piece of this scares me a lot, too. There is $200 million in there this time for trainers. But in the Vietnam war they were often called advisers. Once you get people in doing this, it is very easy to keep pulling and pulling and pulling more folks into that war. I hope that we start thinking, in this post-cold-war period, about how we are going to interact with our allies.
Patricia Schroeder: “I rise in support of the Hamilton amendment. I think it is the correct one. But listen to the coalition here. The…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Hamilton amendment related to lifting the embargo and military involvement.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I was concerned about the words ``shameless demagoguery.'' I think those are words we could have taken down, and I do not really want to do that. But I think that is a very strong word.
editorials all over America are joining those of us who keep calling for the release of whatever it is that was produced by the outside counsel for over a half a million dollars of tax money on Speaker Gingrich's violations of the ethics…
But that ``it'' cost a half a million dollars and we cannot see it. This morning's Washington Post has a clarification of what the Speaker said about the ``it'' in it. And I hope that everybody reads it, because while the Speaker said one…
here are six reasons to vote against the fiscal year 1997 DOD authorization conference report: First, the measure provides: $11.3 billion more than the Pentagon requested overall, $7 billion more than requested for procurement, $3.8…





