I must say I hope Members think about the bill that we had under debate when the committee rose, because at this moment we still have the President in Egypt talking about terrorism, and what I think has happened is we have gutted the terrorism provisions in this bill. So while the President is away trying to say we will not allow terrorists to terrorize us into not pursuing peace, we are here undoing the terrorism bill, and I do not think that is a happy conclusion for anybody. I feel like we should ring him up and say, hello, President, guess what we just did. I do not think the President is going to be too happy about that. I think tomorrow we are going to have an opportunity to reinstate the terrorism provisions, and I hope Members think about that.
Patricia Schroeder: “I must say I hope Members think about the bill that we had under debate when the committee rose, because at this moment…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of changes to terrorism provisions in a bill while the President is abroad.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I am proud to be in that category, and I wanted to say why. If you look back on this last century, think of what it would have been like if there had not been progressives or there had not been liberals. There clearly would not have been…
I clearly rise in support of this bill, and I really want to thank the chairman of the subcommittee, Carlos Moorhead, from California, who has done such a wonderful job to move this bill in the very short period of time we have left. We…
I rise to agree with what the gentleman had to say. Mr. Chairman, I tell this body that the gentleman from California is being very humble. He has worked very hard on this issue, and so has the Department of Commerce. We have a letter…
Mr. Speaker, I think what we have just heard in this colloquy is why we ought to vote against this rule and get this bill out of here. We hear about cruel and unusual punishment, but this is going to be cruel and outrageous legislation…





