I really find it amazing that the Federal Government does not want to be under the same law as everyone else is. This would exempt 12 Federal facilities... from the laws that every other local government, State government and industry would be subjected to. Furthermore, we will hear... the claim that they need an exemption for national security purposes. The bill allows the President with the stroke of a pen to exempt anything, any Federal facility, if that is necessary. Beyond that, two are closed and one is being decommissioned. Why would we remove a closed or a decommissioned facility from jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act for national security purposes?
Patricia Schroeder: “I really find it amazing that the Federal Government does not want to be under the same law as everyone else is. This…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing exemptions for federal facilities from the Clean Water Act during a committee debate.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I just wanted to respond that in the Wright case it took 2 weeks to get a special counsel, and in the Gingrich case we talked about 15 months. I think there is a great difference. Thank you.
But that ``it'' cost a half a million dollars and we cannot see it. This morning's Washington Post has a clarification of what the Speaker said about the ``it'' in it. And I hope that everybody reads it, because while the Speaker said one…
I was really pleased to hear the Speaker say he did not have an objection to it, and was wondering, since it appears to have been cleared and so noncontroversial, could we get it out and could we get it passed?
I wanted to inquire about the suffragettes who are still in the basement of the rotunda, who have been down there since 1921. I understand that the funding has now been procured privately to raise them up to the first, to the main floor…





