If I may reclaim my time, I do not think we are communicating. What I am saying is clearly what I want to do is send a strong message from this Congress to local officials that with this money comes the ability for them to then have no excuses for protecting women's constitutional rights because we spoke before on that very clearly when we passed the prior bill. Now, there may be some ancillary issues. I understand what the gentleman is saying. But I do not think that message gets through with the gentleman's amendment, because he has that qualifier on it. That is why I am saying could he accept a substitute that would specifically list women's reproductive health facilities? Because then I think it is standing there clearly, saying we will not accept excuses to localities who get money and then do not use it.
Patricia Schroeder: “If I may reclaim my time, I do not think we are communicating. What I am saying is clearly what I want to do is send a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of funding for women's constitutional rights and reproductive health facilities.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I just wanted to respond that in the Wright case it took 2 weeks to get a special counsel, and in the Gingrich case we talked about 15 months. I think there is a great difference. Thank you.
There was in the past century a man named Mr. Comstock, and Mr. Comstock was one of these people who decided only he knew what was virtuous and right, and somehow he managed to convince all sorts of people that this was correct. He even in…
I must say, for me this is a very sad day, because if my colleagues really believe we need the best government money can buy, they must be thrilled. Let me put this in some kind of context. My average campaign contribution when I first got…
Mr. Speaker, I think what we have just heard in this colloquy is why we ought to vote against this rule and get this bill out of here. We hear about cruel and unusual punishment, but this is going to be cruel and outrageous legislation…





