If indeed there is a threat to national security, particularly at those closed bases or the base that is being decommissioned... Why should we grant a blanket exemption under this bill when the President has the authority as Commander in Chief to exempt any individual military facility? In particular, why is it in the States of California, Idaho, and South Carolina that we would exempt facilities that are closed or being decommissioned? It is particularly puzzling.
Patricia Schroeder: “If indeed there is a threat to national security, particularly at those closed bases or the base that is being…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing national security concerns related to military facility exemptions during a House debate.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I was really pleased to hear the Speaker say he did not have an objection to it, and was wondering, since it appears to have been cleared and so noncontroversial, could we get it out and could we get it passed?
The reason I feel the EEOC is very different from other regulatory agencies is we have piled a bigger and bigger workload on them. If we are going to pile a bigger workload on a regulatory agency but treat it the same as SEC when it has a…
It certainly looks to me like we are checking all the regular procedures. We want to run away as fast as possible. The question is, what are we running from? I am very saddened, because I think this is what we are running from. We are…
Today free speech has been frozen on the House floor. I never thought I could live to see that day. We have now had a ruling today that newspapers can discuss these issues, editorial boards can discuss these issues, but the Members of this…





