I will be very brief because the gentleman from Texas is being very kind. I am glad I got to answer these statements. No. 1, the cost for bringing the statue up. There has been a private group that the Senate has put together that is willing to do this, it is my understanding, so that is not an issue. No. 2, I find that countering spousal impoverishment by saying that estate taxes are too high; for heaven's sakes, if they are both in the poorhouse, estate taxes are not going to matter. So we are beginning to see what the gentleman from Arizona and his party----
Patricia Schroeder: “I will be very brief because the gentleman from Texas is being very kind. I am glad I got to answer these statements.…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the cost of bringing a statue and discussing estate taxes.
Share
More from Patricia Schroeder
I thought the gentleman from Georgia [Mr. Lewis] made a very emotional and correct approach. There comes a time when we all must stand up and say, what are these rules for? Are they to keep the American people from learning the truth? I am…
I find that fairly astonishing, that they tell us we can go outside and talk about it, but we cannot talk about it on the floor.
I was really pleased to hear the Speaker say he did not have an objection to it, and was wondering, since it appears to have been cleared and so noncontroversial, could we get it out and could we get it passed?
But that ``it'' cost a half a million dollars and we cannot see it. This morning's Washington Post has a clarification of what the Speaker said about the ``it'' in it. And I hope that everybody reads it, because while the Speaker said one…





