Despite what my colleague from Ohio contends, this amendment comports the ruling of the United States v. Lovett, a 1946 Supreme Court case dealing with a bill of attainder. The guidelines in Lovett, this amendment singles out no individuals, but, rather, attempts to restructure the managerial level of a government agency, a task well within Congress' power of the purse. This task is necessary because the position has proven especially wasteful over the past few years, failing to rein in abuse within the agency that led to congressional investigations. Mr. Chairman, I ask my colleagues to support this amendment. I yield back the balance of my time.
Ken Buck: “Despite what my colleague from Ohio contends, this amendment comports the ruling of the United States v. Lovett, a 1946…”
Share
More from Ken Buck
I would think that the RNC could find someone who isn't a criminal defendant who could make sure that there is election integrity in the next election.
I think the Joe Biden -- President Biden has done a great job of trying to stay above the fray and recognizing that his department of justice was in a very difficult position.
I think that President Biden wouldn't do anything until after the appeals are finished, number one, and that's going to happen after the election. So he's going to have much more flexibility after the election whether he wins or loses to…
Yes, I believe the -- that President Trump will do what the courts tell him to do. I also believe we have a $36 trillion debt. I also believe that President Trump won the popular vote with the mandate on immigration, inflation and to…





