I do want to--you each to talk about collaboration, and that takes more time, more money, more people, and yet it is crucial, and yet, we are going to likely enter a phase where we are not going to have more money.

I think that is the--even some of the discussions about copper and mining and a lot of these things, we are having to look at them in a new light, and our forests, NEPA, each of these historical, important sets of rules, we have to examine…

I am always glad to yield to Angus King because you always learn something.

the climate change is something you have got to put in your calculation and that the expenses of air quality at this level are, you know, when you actually begin trying to itemize them, it becomes enormous.

The smoke that we are seeing right now in Washington that is blanketing large portions of America right now is mostly coming from Canada.

We are seeing the planning at the fireshed level, trying to make us more resilient from future wildfires.

How do we make sure that we can maintain the transparency? We can accelerate the time, but we have got to make sure we protect the role of the public in having an opportunity to discuss their own future as well.

I think there is a--as we have heard today at every corner, there should be a sense of urgency.

Great. And again, thank you all for this.

I do not underestimate the complexity of getting to doing this in a way that would be perceived as fair and just.

I do not underestimate the complexity of getting to doing this in a way that would be perceived as fair and just.

How do we make sure that we can maintain the transparency? We can accelerate the time, but we have got to make sure we protect the role of the public in having an opportunity to discuss their own future as well.