I do not think anyone in this body would want to see us reach that result. Douglas went on to write that ``We are a religious people and our institutions presuppose a Supreme Being. When the State encourages religious instruction or cooperates with religious authorities by adjusting the schedule of public events'' or even prayer ``to sectarian needs, it follows the best of our traditions.'' The Justice found that there was no constitutional requirement making it necessary for government to be hostile to religion. In fact, he found quite the opposite.
John Chenoweth: “I do not think anyone in this body would want to see us reach that result. Douglas went on to write that ``We are a…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the relationship between church and state during a debate on the Istook amendment.
Share
More from John Chenoweth
Lastly, Mr. Speaker, in solving this problem between churches and the bankruptcy courts, we are not intending the Federal Government to be involved in any way in overriding scripture or taking away the autonomy and the free exercise of…
I rise in great support of the Istook amendment. The tendency in these days is to interfere with that very precious relationship between parents and children... fully 66 percent of those polled said that they believed that parental…
I believe we should have truth in advertising in everything that is put across the airwaves, but the Shays-Meehan bill does not address that. So we need to leave it to the voters and their great discretion.
And, Mr. Speaker, it is my understanding of the intent of H.R. 2604 that we are not including churches in the same legal classifications as 501(c)(3)s, which are an artificial creation of the State, while the churches are a creation of…





