the Republican rescission package that we have been considering over the last couple of days includes emergency funding for earthquake disaster relief. To pay for this relief, the bill includes $17.2 billion in rescissions across the Federal Government. In light of the Democratic opposition to the bill, go with me for a moment to those thrilling days of yesteryear about 2 years ago. Bill Clinton was the newly elected President. He asked Congress to pass another emergency funding package. This time, however, the package was bigger. It was $16 billion in new spending. There were no offsets. The $16 billion went directly to the deficit. What national emergency was Bill Clinton confronting? He said we needed a national fish atlas, and to assess electronic fish habitat technology, and study the sickle fish chub populations. Mr. Speaker, Bill Clinton began his Federal diet by offering Uncle Sam $16 billion in pork. Today the new Republican majority is making real decisions and real cuts.
Joel Hefley: “the Republican rescission package that we have been considering over the last couple of days includes emergency funding…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Republican rescission package and contrasting it with past Democratic spending.
Share
More from Joel Hefley
I come from cattle country out in Colorado. I can tell you that one of the things that has gotten our cattle producers worked up more than anything in recent times is this animal identification program. They are very, very worried about…
once again I rise to offer an amendment to cut the level of funding in this appropriations bill, to cut by it approximately $272.1 million, or approximately 1 percent of the total outlays of the bill. The reason it is structured a little…
we have just heard from two giants of this body, men that we are all very, very proud of. If we had any sense, we would all sit down right now and take the vote; and I will give up my time if everybody else will give up theirs, and we will…
I do not intend to take 2 minutes, but I just wanted to say that in committee the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Andrews) introduced this amendment. I thought it was an excellent amendment and that we ought to follow through on it. We had…





