the Federal Government is a master at creating Federal programs based upon good intentions, but for which the tax till has become a lifeline for survival. Congress created Amtrak back in 1970 with a one-time grant of $40 million, one-time grant, it was supposed to be. It was to be independent and was to be self-sufficient. As we all know, Amtrak has not become self-sufficient. It has turned into a $22 billion black hole for taxpayer dollars. What have we gotten for our money? Passenger trains in 1997 are slower than they were in the 1950's. Their average speed is slower than many Third World countries. Even tomorrow's version of high speed rail will be slower than France or Japan's trains in the 1970's. Amtrak has used the taxpayers' $22 billion and taken a giant step backward. How do we reward Amtrak for this? In Congress' infinite wisdom we have decided to give Amtrak, which has never paid any taxes, a $2.3 billion tax refund. But to kill the $2.3 billion now, we would have to kill this legislation. While I do not think this bill goes far enough and I know Amtrak will be right back at the Federal trough as soon as it gobbles up the next $2.3 billion, it does contain a number of items which make sense. With the passage of this bill, Amtrak will finally be able to adjust their system of routes without fear that Congress will tie their hands.
Joel Hefley: “the Federal Government is a master at creating Federal programs based upon good intentions, but for which the tax till…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the inefficiencies and funding issues of Amtrak during a floor speech.
Share
More from Joel Hefley
Madam Speaker, once again we find the Boy Scouts of America under attack from the American Civil Liberties Union. This time the ACLU has set its sights on the Department of Defense, challenging its longstanding support of the Boy Scouts…
I do not intend to take 2 minutes, but I just wanted to say that in committee the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Andrews) introduced this amendment. I thought it was an excellent amendment and that we ought to follow through on it. We had…
I think the gentleman from Maryland has a good point, this is a small amount, and it is somewhat symbolic. It is saying, when we are trying to get our budget back in balance, we need to cut wherever we can cut. But even though I would say…
I do rise today to offer an amendment to reduce the budget for the Census Bureau by approximately $174 million. And the reason for that is that this is a particular thing, and let me read from the bill. $173,806,000 is for the reengineered…





