If there is a theory under which the pawnshop is reasonably liable, yes. But just because there is injury does not mean that the seller of the firearm is liable. That is the theory that a lot of these frivolous suits are based on. There is no question that many people who file suits have legitimate injury. The question is, who is liable. In most of these cases, it is not the gun dealer that is liable.
Gary Hart: “If there is a theory under which the pawnshop is reasonably liable, yes. But just because there is injury does not mean…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing liability issues related to firearm sales and lawsuits.
Share
More from Gary Hart
Hopefully, if I may move us in the direction of a discourse without threats of violence, without acts of violence, and toward the goal that all of these leaders profess to have, at least most of them, which is peace.
I rise in support of the Dominican Republic- CAFTA agreement. Our colleagues have discussed a lot of issues regarding CAFTA: whether it is important to our national security and whether it will help those countries to grow and become more…
I want to also emphasize the support we have heard today not only from our colleagues, but the support we have heard today from the Lyons family from Kentucky, the support that we have heard from a number of different families who have…
I especially thank the chairman for his indulgence in allowing me some time on this legislation, and I am honored to be part of the Financial Services Committee argument today for this House bill 280, the Brownfields Redevelopment…





