I stand in support of the supplemental and opposed to the amendment. $67 billion for our troops, $19 billion for reconstruction should be a grant. This is simply the right thing for us to do. This Congress voted to support the President and our military action in Iraq. The United States does as it usually does and took the lead in freeing the Iraqi people from a tyrannical dictator, and we have succeeded. The job is not complete. We cannot say we did half the job that we decided to do and then ask someone else to pay us to finish the job. We removed Iraq from the list of countries supporting terrorism. We are currently in a struggle to rebuild that country, to help the good people of Iraq to take back their country. Our military, together with our State Department, together with dedicated Iraqis are working together to defeat the remnants of Hussein's regime and to move toward a better future. Already, schools have opened, businesses are opening. People are going back to their lives. They have a hopeful future. They are making great progress.
Gary Hart: “I stand in support of the supplemental and opposed to the amendment. $67 billion for our troops, $19 billion for…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing support for military funding and reconstruction efforts in Iraq.
Share
More from Gary Hart
First of all, this administration inherited a recession. Our goal was to bring us out of the recession. A number of these tax cuts and adjustments, tax credits, helped bring our Nation out of a recession. If we allow those tax cuts to be…
I want to also emphasize the support we have heard today not only from our colleagues, but the support we have heard today from the Lyons family from Kentucky, the support that we have heard from a number of different families who have…
Yusus a-Balkhi, no longer a threat to the United States. Mohammed Saeed Kazim al-Saha, no longer a threat to the United States. Abd al-Rahim al-Nashiri, no longer a threat to the United States. Ibrahim Bah, no longer a threat to the United…
If there is a theory under which the pawnshop is reasonably liable, yes. But just because there is injury does not mean that the seller of the firearm is liable. That is the theory that a lot of these frivolous suits are based on. There is…





