If all the gentleman is concerned about is that they are getting into the kinds of cases the gentleman does not like and that are proscribed, why do we not limit the gentleman's amendment to making sure they have available at the local level an accounting for the kinds of lawsuits being brought, to see whether any of those violate the restrictions? Why does the gentleman need this other information that will be costly and burdensome for the local legal services operations to put together?
David Skaggs: “If all the gentleman is concerned about is that they are getting into the kinds of cases the gentleman does not like and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to local legal services and lawsuit tracking.
Share
More from David Skaggs
I want to see China improve its human rights record, stop repressing the people of Tibet, allow civil liberties and public dissent, and stop persecuting religious minorities. So I understand the appeal of voting for this resolution. It…
I guess I am in the awkward position of wanting to help love their amendment to death, to acknowledge how meritorious their claim is for additional resources but then say, as the chairman has, 'Not here.' Because the account that they…
I hope the chairman would review this matter when we do go to conference to see if a similar provision could be included in the final version of the bill, which I think would be a good idea.
recent reports of atrocities against Kosovo civilians by Serb security forces are certainly appalling. It is further evidence of President Milosevic's criminality in repressing ethnic Albanians. It is entirely understandable why many…





