I think we need to expound on this point a little bit more. Nobody here is interested in raising taxes per se. This is not about taxes, it is about the Constitution of the United States and having a workable system of government. The examples which you cited, which I think it is important for us to be mindful of, have to do with all manner of different reform proposals. Certainly any of the tax simplification or tax reform proposals that this Congress has adopted in the last 20 years or that are pending before us in various forms now, have almost invariably involved some change in the tax base or change in the rate in order to effect reductions or reforms somewhere else, have they not?
David Skaggs: “I think we need to expound on this point a little bit more. Nobody here is interested in raising taxes per se. This is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of tax reform and its relation to the Constitution.
Share
More from David Skaggs
when the gentleman from Indiana retires at the end of this session of Congress, this body will be losing one of its most thoughtful leaders. Lee Hamilton will be rightly lionized as an expert and a statesman in foreign policy matters; a…
but in recent years, we have allowed the President to usurp Congress' power in this area and far exceed, I believe, what the Constitution contemplated. I just wanted to offer to my colleagues' attention what I hope will be a graphic…
a year ago, when I announced my decision to support fast track trade negotiating authority, I told my constituents that I was supporting it because I believe strongly that good jobs depend on expanded trade--especially for a state like…
I want to first express my thanks to the chairman, the gentleman from Kentucky (Mr. Rogers), and the gentleman from West Virginia (Mr. Mollohan), the ranking member, and especially the fine staffs for the typically excellent work they have…





