On the recordOctober 23, 2019
I oppose the amendment. I think the amendment strikes what is really a commonsense section of the underlying bill. Section 313, beginning on page 49, line 11, comes from the Deceptive Practices and Voter Intimidation Act. It first gives deference to State and local officials to combat deceptive practices in their localities if there is a credible report made that materially false information has been communicated to the public regarding Federal elections such as the time, place, or manner of holding an election. Section 313 provides that the responsibility first falls on State and local officials to correct the materially false information. It is only if State and local election officials fall short of making a correction that the Attorney General would ensure that voters do not fall victim to deceptive practices. I don't believe this is an example of Federal interference or overreach. It is an example of putting to use all levels of government to protect voters in our democracy. Let's be clear, section 313 is, at its core, about enhancing transparency and disclosure. The sort of activity we are talking about here is merely providing factual information to voters to ensure they are not deceived, that they are adequately informed, and that they have a fair chance of participating in their democracy. Section 313, page 51, directs the U.S.…





