On the recordApril 16, 2023
I think it's pretty obvious that we're in New York because of the case of New York v. Donald J. Trump.
Source
congress.govZoe Lofgren: “I think it's pretty obvious that we're in New York because of the case of New York v. Donald J. Trump.”
Editor's note · Context
Lofgren highlights the political motivations behind the hearing's location.
Share
More from Zoe Lofgren
May 27, 2026
Immigrants have valiantly served in our nation’s military since its founding.
Jul 22, 2024
May I inquire how much time is remaining. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentlewoman has 11 minutes remaining.
Jun 27, 2025
I oppose the Kim resolution. Now, had it just condemned violence and thanked the National Guard and the Marines, who did not ask for this assignment, I think we would all be on board. Instead, the resolution really is engaging in partisan…
Jul 22, 2024
I claim the time in opposition. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is the gentleman opposed to the motion?
Other voices in this conversation
