On the recordSeptember 9, 2021
I was astonished, frankly, by his statements. Number one, there is no basis in law for it. Number two, as you point out, eighties a felony to obstruct a congressional investigation, 1505 of the 18 USC.
Source
msnbc.comZoe Lofgren: “I was astonished, frankly, by his statements. Number one, there is no basis in law for it. Number two, as you point out…”
Editor's note · Context
Lofgren reacts to Kevin McCarthy's threats against telecom companies regarding compliance with congressional inquiries.
Share
More from Zoe Lofgren
Jul 22, 2024
When a member of the House Judiciary Committee asked Shira Perlmutter, the Register of Copyrights and the Director of the U.S. Copyright Office, for her opinion of the Pro Codes Act, this is what she said: ``The public should have access…
Jul 22, 2024
I claim the time in opposition. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is the gentleman opposed to the motion?
May 7, 2024
I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Michigan (Ms. Stevens), a distinguished member of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, who did so much work on this.
Other voices in this conversation
