We have no additional speakers at this point. I would just note that--and I understand the gentleman's points one through four. I completely agree. It is number five in your amendment that causes me concern about whether there is actually an undercutting of H.R. 1's disclosure requirements, and that is the concern we have and why I am so sorry that I cannot support the amendment. I do think that we have a disagreement over disclosure. I don't understand why, because the Supreme Court, including Justice Scalia, recommended that to us, and we never followed up with Justice Scalia's admonition that we should have disclosure as a remedy for concern over unlimited money. Madam Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Zoe Lofgren: “We have no additional speakers at this point. I would just note that--and I understand the gentleman's points one…”
On the recordMarch 7, 2019
Share
More from Zoe Lofgren
Apr 29, 2026
I rise in opposition to reauthorizing FISA section 702 without meaningful reform. At a time when the Trump administration is building a sweeping surveillance apparatus, trampling civil rights, and disregarding the rule of law, Congress…
Jun 12, 2024
Now, some of my colleagues on the other side of the aisle claim the verdict against the ex-President is--and these are all quotes, ``a travesty,'' ``rigged,'' and ``a sham,'' that the jury of peers who assembled to do their civic duty…
May 27, 2026
Immigrants have valiantly served in our nation’s military since its founding.
May 2, 2026
“It unfortunately is no surprise a president who has attacked NSF from day one would seek to destroy the board that helps guide the foundation.”





