the law does not appear to be on the former president`s side. The statute is not on his side. The judgment has already been made by the real president.
Zoe Lofgren: “the law does not appear to be on the former president`s side. The statute is not on his side. The judgment has already…”
Editor's note · Context
Lofgren asserts that the law and statute do not support Trump's claims regarding executive privilege.
Share
More from Zoe Lofgren
This was the most transparent committee, probably, in the history of Congress.
I rise as chair of the California Democratic congressional delegation in opposition to this rule. It makes in order three resolutions that claim to be pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, but are completely illegitimate. That is not…
I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Michigan (Ms. Stevens), a distinguished member of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, who did so much work on this.
I rise in opposition to reauthorizing FISA section 702 without meaningful reform. At a time when the Trump administration is building a sweeping surveillance apparatus, trampling civil rights, and disregarding the rule of law, Congress…





