if we take time to review the details of this bill, we will see it is bad for America. The premise that religious people cannot help solve America's social problems is simply wrong. I spent 14 years in local government. We worked with Catholic Charities and many others. We do not need this radical departure from the Bill of Rights to work with Catholics, Protestants, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, or Jains to solve America's problems. Consider the plain language of the first amendment: ``Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.'' I think that is clear. But this bill would take tax money and give it directly to churches. How can that not run afoul of the constitutional prohibition against the establishment of religion? Our country was started by people seeking religious freedom to worship, and this fundamental American value was put in the very first amendment to our Constitution. When government becomes involved in establishing or preferring religions, trouble follows.
Zoe Lofgren: “if we take time to review the details of this bill, we will see it is bad for America. The premise that religious people…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a bill that would allocate tax money to religious organizations.
Share
More from Zoe Lofgren
I urge that we support and enact this good bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.
I include in the Record an article by David Halperin from this March titled: ``Congress Should Reject Bill to Let Private Groups Control Access to U.S. Laws.'' The article can be found at the following link: https://…
I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Michigan (Ms. Stevens), a distinguished member of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, who did so much work on this.
I have spoken publicly against this bill and its serious health care cuts. You can't pull a trillion dollars out of the health care system and expect health care providers to survive. Clinics, hospitals and nursing homes won't survive the…





