On title V, and this is something of actual considerable concern to me, the bill was amended to retain existing law for ex parte reexaminations. For inter parte's reexamination the basic framework in the bill was retained under title V but with the limitation that a third party requestor cannot appeal an adverse decision to the court of appeals for the Federal circuit court. I am wondering if the gentleman can convince us why this change made after the bill was reported from the committee was necessary and why it should compel our support.
Zoe Lofgren: “On title V, and this is something of actual considerable concern to me, the bill was amended to retain existing law for…”
On the recordAugust 3, 1999
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing amendments to title V of a bill regarding reexaminations in patent law.
Share
More from Zoe Lofgren
Mar 2, 2025
because of possible retaliatory actions against his family and/or community members.
Feb 9, 2025
My fear is that the chaos the new administration is sowing will be enough to leave our science and technology enterprise in ruins, with Chinese Communist leaders in Beijing popping champagne corks.
Sep 23, 2024
I urge that we support and enact this good bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.
Jan 8, 2026
there is mourning across the aisle and across the State of California. I chair the California Democratic delegation, and we are deeply saddened by the loss of Doug LaMalfa. It was a pleasure to serve with Doug since his election in 2013…





