I yield myself 45 seconds to note that in the Providian case I mentioned where the district attorney in San Francisco pursued a remedy for the citizens, the public, the people in San Francisco, obtaining a $300 million benefit for consumers, there was incomplete diversity and it was not removed because one of the subsidiary defendants was from out of State. However, under this act, that action would have to be removed and would have to be dismissed, because rule 23 relative to class actions cannot possibly be complied with by district attorneys acting on behalf of the people, and I think that this is a very stealthy way to eliminate jurisdiction of district attorneys and city attorneys acting in their civil capacity on the part of the people. I would urge that this amendment be adopted to cure this fatal defect. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Zoe Lofgren: “I yield myself 45 seconds to note that in the Providian case I mentioned where the district attorney in San Francisco…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a legal act on district attorneys' jurisdiction during a floor debate.
Share
More from Zoe Lofgren
We are fortunate, indeed, to have Dr. Caraveo as a Member of our House with her keen intellect and pragmatic approach to solving America's problems. I yield such time as she may consume to the gentlewoman from Colorado (Ms. Caraveo).
I want to start off by recognizing that the felony convictions of a former President represent a first for our country and that is solemn. I don't celebrate these convictions.
Now they have reached NOAA where they’re wreaking havoc on the scientific and regulatory systems that protect American families’ safety and jobs.
I urge that we support and enact this good bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.





