In the last Congress we did, without one Republican vote, more to help working families through the increase in the working families' tax credit, sometimes known as the EITC. We did not have one vote from that side of the aisle to help people with families working, earning less than $27,000 a year. That used to be a bipartisan issue. Where the Republicans decided not only to oppose the minimum wage but an increase in the earned income tax credit comes from surprises me. But perhaps at the moment we have simply to look at their proposal in lieu of a minimum wage increase, which does nothing but redistribute poverty among working families. It does not help anyone's income to go up.
Victor Fazio: “In the last Congress we did, without one Republican vote, more to help working families through the increase in the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the lack of Republican support for working families' tax credit and minimum wage increases.
Share
More from Victor Fazio
It is my understanding that crop insurance was not part of the legislation when it passed these individual Houses and was added simply on the same basis that the food stamp provision was. There is some inconsistency.
I have been reading the gentleman's amendment, and I think that I can come up with a number of phrases that would apparently be permitted but which, under his amendment, would be very questionable. Think of words like ``Think Joe Smith''…
As we get closer to the time the session comes to an end, and the election is not too far beyond that, is it possible we will take another crack at fast track before the session is ended?
I think it makes a bad proposal less bad, but I understand that the gentleman has the votes on his side, so I certainly will not oppose it. In fact, I encourage him to offer it. But I do think that when we begin to think about those things…





