I think all of this is a diversion from the fact that finally, finally under the leadership of the Republican Party we have gotten a $23 billion reduction in spending over last year, and through the cooperation of the President in the last few days, we now have a package which will reverse spending in Washington, DC, which will demand that Government now begin to become accountable to the people which it serves. The people do not serve the Government, we serve the people, the working people out there.
Victor Fazio: “I think all of this is a diversion from the fact that finally, finally under the leadership of the Republican Party we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget reductions and government accountability during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Victor Fazio
I think this is a very, very difficult concept to administer, and let me give my colleagues some examples as to how difficult it would be. If a Member is from Kansas City, Missouri, this places a much higher value on funds they would raise…
As we get closer to the time the session comes to an end, and the election is not too far beyond that, is it possible we will take another crack at fast track before the session is ended?
It is my understanding that crop insurance was not part of the legislation when it passed these individual Houses and was added simply on the same basis that the food stamp provision was. There is some inconsistency.
Mr. Chairman, I want to ask the author of the amendment if he would explain to me what is different from existing laws. As I understand it, we have always required that every President, going back as far as I can remember, reimburse part…





