Political Quotes

Victor Fazio: the Senate passed its budget resolution over 2 months ago. Under the rules of the House, we should have passed a budget…

On the recordJune 4, 1998
the Senate passed its budget resolution over 2 months ago. Under the rules of the House, we should have passed a budget resolution at least by the 15th of April. So we come to the floor very late today, and one would think at this late date, we would be prepared with a tight, consensus budget. In fact, that is not the case. We have a $24 billion black hole in this budget resolution the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Kasich) will present today. We double count cuts in food stamp administration, we double count cuts in veterans spending. In fact, unless we can find alternatives to using these cuts twice, we will pass a fraudulent budget or end up cutting these programs for more than any of us intend. The New York Times said of this resolution when it came to the Budget committee that ``it fails the basic integrity test and that the House should vote it down, demanding instead a budget that is real, not rigged.'' I agree, Mr. Speaker. We are not ready, even at this late date, with the Committee on Appropriations waiting in the wings to deal with a budget resolution that just does not add up. Let us protect Social Security and not spend any of the surplus until we have found a solution to the baby boom bulge and bring the Social Security fund into balance.
Said by
Victor Fazio
Democratic · California

Editor's note · Context

Discussing concerns about the House budget resolution and its implications for Social Security.

Share

More from Victor Fazio

Oct 2, 1998

I rise in support of it, and want to express my deep thanks for the way in which the people I represent in agriculture in California have been treated in this bill and in prior bills. I have enjoyed greatly my opportunity to serve on this…

govinfo.gov
Jul 30, 1998

I think it makes a bad proposal less bad, but I understand that the gentleman has the votes on his side, so I certainly will not oppose it. In fact, I encourage him to offer it. But I do think that when we begin to think about those things…

govinfo.gov
Jun 24, 1998

There may be another approach taken, if the gentlewoman will yield further, that I have not mentioned but still a way in which these growers would not be discriminated against vis-a-vis other agricultural producers?

govinfo.gov
Jul 20, 1998

Mr. Chairman, I want to ask the author of the amendment if he would explain to me what is different from existing laws. As I understand it, we have always required that every President, going back as far as I can remember, reimburse part…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation