when President Clinton stood here a few months ago and announced his support for a bill that had been authored by Senator Kassebaum and the gentlewoman from New Jersey, Mrs. Roukema, to be joined by the gentlemen from Massachusetts, Senator Ted Kennedy, and Joseph Kennedy, the country was ecstatic. They were convinced for the first time we would actually do something about the need to make health insurance portable and to prevent prior conditions from making insurance either unavailable or unaffordable to many people. Tragically, we are here tonight debating a bill that goes far beyond that consensus, that moves us into conflict on issues like MSAs, that are a pure giveaway to a gentleman from Indiana named Mr. Rooney, who legitimate insurance salesmen in my district claim they would never sell policies for. We have watered down portability, we have limited the ability to prevent prior conditions from being remedied in this legislation, because we have taken an approach that does not really give people what they have been told they will get. They will pay more if there are fortunate enough at all to be able to continue to have health coverage. They are not going to be able to keep the kind of plan they have had. This proposal ensures they will pay more.
Victor Fazio: “when President Clinton stood here a few months ago and announced his support for a bill that had been authored by…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating a health insurance bill and its implications for portability and pre-existing conditions.
Share
More from Victor Fazio
As we look to the next Congress, the one that will fix the Social Security system for the out years, the baby boomers, we need to maintain every dime we can so that we do not end up forcing people to work longer or live longer to benefit…
sometimes these bills are known for what they do and sometimes for what they do not do. I think that most of us today are pleased that we are beginning to attend to the problems created by the disasters that have befallen this country over…
To conclude, Mr. Chairman, I would simply say this is an important effort in Shays-Meehan to stop the explosion of soft money and sham issue ads. It does not deal with many of the other issues that have been brought up in other campaign…
I think it makes a bad proposal less bad, but I understand that the gentleman has the votes on his side, so I certainly will not oppose it. In fact, I encourage him to offer it. But I do think that when we begin to think about those things…





