despite an overwhelming bipartisan defeat in the Senate, unfortunately we have before us another attempt to gut a program that gives women and minorities the chance to compete for Federal highway dollars. The Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program works. It puts women and minorities to work. It gives them the chance to compete in an industry that has traditionally shut them out. It is not a quota. It is not a set-aside. If it were, do we really think that Ronald Reagan's administration would have created this program? I think a not. The highway bill offers so much to so many. It is wrong to turn back the clock on women and minority-owned businesses. Let us not put a tollgate on the road to opportunity for these aspiring entrepreneurs. We can further refine this program. As the President has said, mend it, do not end it. But this amendment goes too far. I urge a ``no'' vote and, frankly, a return to the kind of bipartisan spirit that has allowed us to begin to make some progress against the legacy of discrimination. This program should be reaffirmed and not eliminated.
Victor Fazio: “despite an overwhelming bipartisan defeat in the Senate, unfortunately we have before us another attempt to gut a…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment to the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise program during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Victor Fazio
I think this is a very, very difficult concept to administer, and let me give my colleagues some examples as to how difficult it would be. If a Member is from Kansas City, Missouri, this places a much higher value on funds they would raise…
There may be another approach taken, if the gentlewoman will yield further, that I have not mentioned but still a way in which these growers would not be discriminated against vis-a-vis other agricultural producers?
To conclude, Mr. Chairman, I would simply say this is an important effort in Shays-Meehan to stop the explosion of soft money and sham issue ads. It does not deal with many of the other issues that have been brought up in other campaign…
Mr. Chairman, I want to ask the author of the amendment if he would explain to me what is different from existing laws. As I understand it, we have always required that every President, going back as far as I can remember, reimburse part…





