I agree with Mr. Obey. If he's said it once, he's said it a thousand times: This legislative language has no place in an appropriations bill. The issues that this bill touches--from abortion to workers' rights-- are complicated and controversial. They should be considered out in the open in the committee with primary jurisdiction. If the Majority is proud of this legislation, its members should have the opportunity to hold public hearings to discuss these matters with the public. If this legislation--and that's just what it is--is so important, it should stand on its own, and not hide behind the cover of an appropriations bill. That said, I rise in support of Mr. Obey's amendment to strike the pages and pages of legislative language in this bill. This inclusion is more than unnecessary and a waste of our time. It is malicious. It targets the most vulnerable in our communities, women who have been assaulted by rapists, and children who have been victims of incest. In some cases, this bill rescinds years of legal precedent. In this bill, court decisions in labor cases are overruled. The demolition does not end here. The supporters are attempting to give political pay back to their conservative supporters. Let me give you two examples. The language in this bill about gender equity in college sports is unfair to our daughters. Title IX enforcement ensures that our sons and daughters have an equal chance to take part in sports while they are in school.
Victor Fazio: “I agree with Mr. Obey. If he's said it once, he's said it a thousand times: This legislative language has no place in an…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about legislative language in an appropriations bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Victor Fazio
when I came to Congress 20 years ago I had hundreds of sugar beet growers in the Sacramento Valley. Today we have far fewer. Acreage is down. We have lost a number of refineries. They are closing because there is not enough product grown…
Reclaiming my time, then, what the gentleman is saying is that the approach that has been the time-honored bipartisan approach which has given both Republican and Democratic, Presidents the opportunity and flexibility to include various…
I have been reading the gentleman's amendment, and I think that I can come up with a number of phrases that would apparently be permitted but which, under his amendment, would be very questionable. Think of words like ``Think Joe Smith''…
first of all let me say how much I appreciate the gentleman from California (Mr. Lewis) and want him to know that in the future when people come to me and ask how we are going to accomplish this or that, I am going to simply refer them to…





