Mr. Chairman, the sponsors of this amendment to terminate the gas turbine-modular helium reactor [GT-MHR] program appear not to appreciate the environmental benefits provided by nuclear power and the particularly unique environmental advantages of the GT-MHR technology. To exploit the benefits of nuclear power, the development of advanced nuclear technologies needs to be continued with the objective of achieving higher efficiencies, enhanced safety characteristics, lower costs, greater proliferation resistance, and less environmental impact. The GT-MHR is the only foreseeable option that offers an improvement in these characteristics. Today, over 20 percent of the Nation's electricity is being produced by nuclear power which is displacing, on a yearly basis, 600 million tons of carbon dioxide, 5 million tons of sulfur dioxide, and 2 million tons of nitrogen oxides. However, 70 percent of the electrical power is being provided by burning fossil fuels--mostly coal, some natural gas, and some oil. Combustion of these fuels results in the production of significant environmental pollution--greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, acid rain gases such as sulfur dioxide, and smog effluents such as nitrogen oxides.
Victor Fazio: “Mr. Chairman, the sponsors of this amendment to terminate the gas turbine-modular helium reactor [GT-MHR] program appear…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the environmental benefits of nuclear power and the GT-MHR technology.
Share
More from Victor Fazio
I have been fortunate to serve on this subcommittee for 19 years, and I must say I have always enjoyed the bipartisan atmosphere in which the work has been conducted. Tom Bevill and John Myers were the senior members of each party for…
I personally believe public financing is the way of the future. I think we have neglected it in the presidential system and need to reinvigorate public support for it. But I am more concerned tonight that we not impede progress on…
I did not serve here during the Watergate era. But in the 20 years I have been here, I have been greatly involved in ethics issues, serving on the Committee on Ethics for 8 years and leading on perhaps the most important bill of my career…
it is my understanding that crop insurance was not part of the legislation when it passed these individual Houses and was added simply on the same basis that the food stamp provision was. There is some inconsistency.





