Mr. Tiahrt's amendment would cut energy conservation R&D from $411.2 million to $230.1 million. The fiscal year 1995 level was $468.5 million. Large cuts have already been taken. Energy R&D has fallen 75 percent since the late 1970's, in constant dollars. The committee's bill already contains a 23 percent cut in energy R&D relative to the President's request. Total U.S. energy efficiency R&D costs each taxpayer about $5.50 per year and saves them $65. This amendment would cut critical programs assisting in the development of new, clean transportation technologies including electric vehicles. It would cut the Federal Energy Management Program, which installs money-saving equipment in Federal buildings, saving taxpayers $4 in Federal operating expenses for every $1 spent. These are just to mention a few of the programs which will help to reduce our dependence on foreign oil in the future. The bottom line is this cut would be penny wise and pound foolish. I urge the committee to oppose the Tiahrt amendment.
Victor Fazio: “Mr. Tiahrt's amendment would cut energy conservation R&D from $411.2 million to $230.1 million. The fiscal year 1995…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment to cut funding for energy conservation research and development.
Share
More from Victor Fazio
Several weeks ago, Congress overwhelmingly rejected a bid by right-wing foundations and corporate interests that would have tilted the political balance in America. By an overwhelming bipartisan vote, the House defeated a bill that…
In addition, if I could ask of the leader, the Speaker has promised a vote on campaign finance reform by the end of March. I note that we have what appear to be four individual bills; I do not know the content of all of them. But is this…
To conclude, Mr. Chairman, I would simply say this is an important effort in Shays-Meehan to stop the explosion of soft money and sham issue ads. It does not deal with many of the other issues that have been brought up in other campaign…
I just could not resist getting involved with my California friends in the debate in this measure, which I would like to tombstone as the Richard Mellon Scaife Empowerment Act of 1998. This gentleman from the well-known banking family of…





