Mr. Chairman, we know that there have been foreign attacks on our election infrastructure. That is a fact. Knowing there are those out there who seek to rob us of our democracy, why would we leave our door wide open? Why would we not create a shield when our democracy is under attack? The SHIELD Act, carefully drafted by my colleague and chair, Ms. Lofgren, requires that political campaigns report any information they receive from foreign agents to the FBI so we can centralize information and stop attacks. Why would we not want to do that? The SHIELD Act establishes strong penalties for online voter intimidation by foreign actors. Why would we not want to do that? The SHIELD Act closes loopholes that allow foreigners to spend their money in our elections. Why would we not want to do that? There are enemies out there every day trying to cast doubt on our elections. We have no excuse--no excuse--for not doing all we can to make ourselves less vulnerable. This should be a bipartisan no-brainer, Mr. Chairman. I urge my colleagues to support the SHIELD Act to protect our democracy.
Share & report
More from Susan Davis
Madam Speaker, I want to talk about the administration's move to cut hundreds of thousands of people from SNAP, our Nation's safety net for those faced with food insecurity. By the USDA's own estimates, nearly 700,000 people will be hurt…
Mr. Speaker, it is hard to believe that some have already forgotten the lessons we have learned from the BP oil spill disaster. It was only a few years ago that we saw millions of gallons of oil being spilled into the Gulf of Mexico, and…
I believe a women's history museum, like what we are voting on today, could help the Smithsonian accomplish that critical goal.
On behalf of the American people, Congress, the Board of Regents, and Smithsonian management have a responsibility to ensure the continued success of the institution for future generations.





