We know that there have been foreign attacks on our election infrastructure. That is a fact. Knowing there are those out there who seek to rob us of our democracy, why would we leave our door wide open? Why would we not create a shield when our democracy is under attack? The SHIELD Act, carefully drafted by my colleague and chair, Ms. Lofgren, requires that political campaigns report any information they receive from foreign agents to the FBI so we can centralize information and stop attacks. Why would we not want to do that? The SHIELD Act establishes strong penalties for online voter intimidation by foreign actors. Why would we not want to do that? The SHIELD Act closes loopholes that allow foreigners to spend their money in our elections. Why would we not want to do that? There are enemies out there every day trying to cast doubt on our elections. We have no excuse--no excuse--for not doing all we can to make ourselves less vulnerable. This should be a bipartisan no-brainer, Mr. Chairman. I urge my colleagues to support the SHIELD Act to protect our democracy.
Share
More from Susan Davis
the level of detail that we are getting here is just not acceptable for us to exercise our oversight
I thank Mr. Scott for yielding me the additional time. We all talk a good game in wanting to build this economy and build opportunities for our constituents who do not want to pursue a 4-year degree, but we haven't put financial muscle and…
I thank the chairman for yielding. Usually, one's healthcare is not top of mind, until it is. This, Madam Speaker, is one of those times. We have to protect people's healthcare, men and women, whether it is battling the coronavirus…
For weeks, people across the country have been protesting in the streets, demanding justice for George Floyd, for Breonna Taylor, and for a countless number of people killed by police. Sadly, incidents like these are something that our…





