On the recordFebruary 18, 2011
I respect the gentleman's interest in the issues before NOAA. But I will have to oppose this effort. Representative Hall's amendment sends the wrong message about the need to meet the growing demands of our nation's businesses and communities for reliable and relevant climate information. Some of us might disagree on the extent climate change is taking place. But to discourage research is a big mistake. Regardless of your opinion, timely and relevant climate information benefits communities, local governments, and businesses. A significant portion of the success of the U.S. economy depends on accurate weather and climate information. Local governments in my home region of San Diego are planning for future trends or changes to sea levels--and NOAA' s research is critical to their work. This amendment also sets poor precedent and policy. NOAA is implementing an internal, budget-neutral organizational structure with the Climate Service office. Using a budget CR to restructure an agency without input or sufficient debate is questionable. Major restructuring efforts should be well thought out and involve study. Let the scientists and the researchers decide what's worthy of their attention. I ask my colleagues to oppose this amendment.
