If we want to do a little comity here, if we want to do what all of us say we want to do, namely, prohibit the use of public funds to pay the union people to do union work, if that is our purpose, and that is my purpose, to prohibit the use of any taxpayers' money, trust fund or otherwise, to pay union representatives or union officials to do work on the taxpayers' money, then that is what the substitute intends to do, accepts that fully. It simply wants to clarify that nothing in this should be interpreted to mean that the union itself must disband and not represent the people with their own money.
Sara Jacobs: “If we want to do a little comity here, if we want to do what all of us say we want to do, namely, prohibit the use of…”
On the recordJuly 11, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the use of public funds for union work during a debate.
Share
More from Sara Jacobs
Jul 20, 2026
The fact of the matter is, we should have the same standards across the board, and we should have clear indicators to measure them and help countries see that they can get more things if they improve their governance.
Aug 17, 2026
It's going to take a lot of work for us to create a society where the domestic work is really shared equally between women and men.
Jul 20, 2026
Security partners with well-governed security sectors are more effective, more reliable, better positioned to absorb and protect United States-origin defense articles from misuse or illicit transfer, and conduct military operations in a…





