this is a paradox day in the U.S. House of Representatives. We are going to raise the earnings limit under Social Security immediately from about $11,000 a year to $14,000 or so a year, I believe, and that will, on average, mean an income of about $20,000 for a Social Security retiree. That is a very good thing to do. The paradox is, at the same time we are not going to be doing anything about the minimum wage. So what are we saying in essence? We are saying that the person who is retired and might work part time needs $24,000 a year, but the young person who is working every day of the week and working hard, maybe digging ditches, and has children to support can get by just fine on $8,840 a year. So I want to congratulate my colleagues on a sense of humor, I suppose, and a wonderful paradox.
Sara Jacobs: “this is a paradox day in the U.S. House of Representatives. We are going to raise the earnings limit under Social…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the increase in Social Security earnings limits while no action is taken on the minimum wage.
Share
More from Sara Jacobs
Get ready for these lists of conflicts of interests because it is long: anything related to national security, the aerospace industry, transportation and highway safety, biomedical technology, artificial intelligence, peer-to-peer payment…
Instead of righting wrongs and making amends to our LGBTQ+ service members and veterans who’ve suffered injustices for decades, I’m ashamed that the Trump Administration has doubled down: kicking trans folks out of the military and banning…
This is about protecting the use of taxpayer dollars and making sure the United States isn’t funding abuse.
I have a motion to recommit at the desk. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the motion to recommit. The Clerk read as follows: Ms. Jacobs of California moves to recommit the bill H.R. 77 to the Committee on the Judiciary. The…





