On the recordApril 14, 2005
Mr. Speaker I rise in strong opposition to the misnamed ``Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act,'' (S. 256). Current bankruptcy law needs some adjustment, but this bill is not the solution. It hurts middle-class consumers in a variety of ways: the bill would allow landlords to evict battered women without bankruptcy court approval, even if the eviction poses a threat to the women's physical well-being; and, it permits credit card companies to reclaim common households goods which are of little value to them, but very important to the debtor's family. It is very important to note that the bill does absolutely nothing to discourage abusive underage lending, nothing to discourage reckless lending to the developmentally disabled and nothing to crack down on unscrupulous pay-day lenders that prey on members of the armed forces. Last year nearly one and a half million middle class individuals filed for bankruptcy. Their average income was less than $25,000 and the principal causes for their filings were layoffs, health problems and divorce. In my judgment, it is a grave mistake to punish these individuals while rewarding credit card companies and business lobbyists at a time when corporate greed has already destroyed the lives of millions of American workers. I will support a balanced bankruptcy reform bill, but S. 256 is in no way balanced and I believe does more harm than good, therefore I strongly oppose this bill.
Source
govinfo.gov




