On the recordApril 24, 2013
To think that sequestration had very little impact because you did not have to lay off or furlough people is a misnomer.
Source
congress.govSam Farr: “To think that sequestration had very little impact because you did not have to lay off or furlough people is a misnomer.”
Editor's note · Context
Farr argues that sequestration did have significant effects despite claims to the contrary.
Share
More from Sam Farr
May 24, 2016
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from California will be postponed. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will read. The Clerk read as…
Mar 15, 2017
History has shown us what we can get by retreating into a defensive, isolationist crouch.
Feb 29, 2016
Yes, I presume that the decision to move sort of out of the Washington area was a strategic one, plus probably cost-effective for real estate purposes.
Other voices in this conversation
