I rise to point out that last night we had quite a victory in this House on campaign finance reform. We had a victory on an amendment, a small step. It is not the answer. The answer is comprehensive campaign reform. People fail to realize that in the elections last time, running for this seat in the House of Representatives cost over half a billion dollars for all the candidates. That was what was reported, because there are a lot of ads done by independent agencies that are not reported. So, Mr. Speaker, if we are going to have meaningful campaign finance reform, we are going to have to put limits on what candidates can spend. That amendment is up today. We are going to have a great debate and we are going to see whether this House can live up to what it has done in 1991, 1992 and 1993, when we passed comprehensive campaign reform that really put limits on campaigns. Shays-Meehan is a step in the right direction, but it is not the answer.
Sam Farr: “I rise to point out that last night we had quite a victory in this House on campaign finance reform. We had a victory on…”
On the recordAugust 4, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing campaign finance reform and the need for comprehensive changes.
Share
More from Sam Farr
Feb 29, 2016
So here we are going to take all our staff, and you have got to go through double, triple inspection, but Members can walk in here with a weapon and you don't even know if they have it, to get away with it.
Mar 15, 2017
We will take our chances down the road, even if that may mean a much steeper cost in terms of American blood and American treasure.
Apr 15, 2016
I rise for the 14th consecutive year in order to speak out on behalf of the LGBTQ youth community. It is unacceptable that, in 2016, young people are still experiencing discrimination across this country based on their sexual orientation…





