I am uncomfortable with the wording of the release language in section 11 of the bill. Section 11 states that the released land 'Shall be managed for multiple use in accordance with land and resources management plans' and that 'those roadless areas need not be managed for the purpose of protecting their suitability for wilderness designation'. Will this language prohibit consideration of the released land for possible future designation as a wilderness, and does it in any way limit wilderness reviews to be conducted in these areas by the Forest Service?
Sam Farr: “I am uncomfortable with the wording of the release language in section 11 of the bill. Section 11 states that the…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the intent and implications of a bill regarding land management and wilderness designation.
Share
More from Sam Farr
I passed legislation called Proud to be an American Day. I was hoping that we could do that on the morning of the Fourth of July, but, because it is a Federal holiday, the Federal immigration people don't work that day. So we have been…
Following the administration's path forward for our international affairs budget is the equivalent of retreat.
If you don't fund the State Department fully then I need to buy more ammunition ultimately.
I thank the gentlewoman for yielding. This is probably the last time I rise on this floor to speak after 23 years of serving here. It may take me a little more than 5 minutes.





