we have received 362 letters in favor of limiting campaign finance in congressional campaigns. We have received two to suggest we ought to spend more money, or are opposed to the limits. It is running over 150 to 1 in favor of exactly what we are doing. I presume your mail is in the same category, so what boggles my mind is how do you come up with a bill they have come up with that goes just opposite, that blows all the lids, takes all the limits off current law and says just more money, more expensive campaigns, money buys influence, let us get more of it?
Sam Farr: “we have received 362 letters in favor of limiting campaign finance in congressional campaigns. We have received two to…”
On the recordJuly 17, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing public support for limiting campaign finance during a debate.
Share
More from Sam Farr
Feb 29, 2016
I would love to have this budget for my town, where we really do have threats.
Mar 15, 2017
My goal for U.S. aid is to achieve a level of effectiveness that every time we provide aid to a region or country it is with the final aim of transitioning them from trade to aid, like we have done in South Korea.
Jul 11, 2016
If you want stable democracy and you are a highly religious society, it simply won't work without religious freedom.
Jul 5, 2016
I thank very much Ranking Member Costa and Chairwoman Lummis for their support of this bill. Mr. Speaker, I think this bill is more than what we just talked about, because it is an incredible collaboration of groups that are not…





