Sam Farr said "Mr. Chairman, I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. That rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment to a general appropriation bill shall not be in order if changing existing law'' One of the provisions is that it ``requires a new determination.'' I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order? The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Colorado." @ PoliticalQuotes.com

On the recordJune 3, 2015

Mr. Chairman, I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. That rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment to a general appropriation bill shall not be in order if changing existing law'' One of the provisions is that it ``requires a new determination.'' I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order? The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Colorado.

Said by

Sam Farr

Democratic · California

Source

govinfo.gov

Share & report

Share on X Share on Facebook Email this quote